One Game Changes Everything
Football fans who were open-minded enough to check out the other football (soccer) this summer probably noticed that the slogan of the World Cup was,
We talk about New York Giants football here. I'll criticize and praise, talk about players and coaches, link to newspapers, etc. You can leave comments.
Redskins blog - yes, I talk to redskins fans (only a few!)
Jets blog - my Dad's.
Mets blog - my Dad's.
Yankees blog - my Dad's.
Watch the New York Giants season as they play Philadelphia Eagles.
New York Giants Tickets
New York Yankees Tickets
New York Rangers Tickets
![]()
Get Free NFL Picks and Compare NFL Odds from 15 different sportsbooks at MadduxSports.com.
Football fans who were open-minded enough to check out the other football (soccer) this summer probably noticed that the slogan of the World Cup was,
July 12th, 2006 at 3:11 pm
Some good choices there, but…. (you know there had to be a but) for the Skins I’d say you chose a game that more symbolized their season, not one that changed their momentum. The same might be said for Dallas.
For the Giants, I’d say, week 8, against the Redskins, coming off the win against Denver and suffering the loss of Wellington Mara to come back and shut out their division rival Washington was a BIG step forward to taking the division, especially after the OT loss in Dallas 2 weeks earlier. This game would come to set the tone for what the Giants would achieve the rest of the season.
For Washington I’d actualy say they had 2 games that made a difference. One was week 5, Denver, where they lost in a close game. They went on to win only 2 of their next 7 games. For a season that started on a high note with wins against Chicago, at Dallas, and Seattle, the week 5 game was the beginning of a very difficult slide from which they had to struggle to get out. As a second choice I’d say the week 13 win which began their 5 game win streak getting them to the playoffs would have to be it. It was do or die time for them, another loss would essentially have guarrenteed they’d be siting home for the playoffs but they pulled it out in dominating style something they would continue over the next several weeks.
For Dallas, I go with the week 12 loss to Denver. A home game before they played 3 of their next 4 games on the road, with 2 of those trips to division rivals. A win here could have given them some momentum to carry with them on their travels. But the loss made every game they played crucial. They went on to lose the next week in NY and again 2 weeks later in Washington. That’s what makes the week 12 loss the “game that made a difference”.
As for Philly I think you hit the nail right on the head the loss against Dallas at home was critical. The division was still up for grabs and while they weren’t doing all that well at that point, losses at Dallas and Wash, this was a home game with home games against Wash and NY as well as their away game in NY still on the schedule, things were far from decided. This was the game that put everything out of reach for them.
Let me know what you think.
July 12th, 2006 at 3:34 pm
All good picks, you’re right that I was going more for the angle of games that symbolized the seasons.
The Redskins actually were a little tough to pick. I picked the week 2 game almost solely cause it set up Santana Moss for a huge season (which in turn turned out to be the piece they were missing in seasons past.)
As for Dallas, they were in the race for a long time and were more of an up and down team then anyone besides maybe the Chargers in the NFL. I actually used week 2 in this case because just the week before they had staged a similar comeback vs. the Chargers. The inconsistancy week to week is what killed them.
The Giants had a lot of memorable games and you can make a case for many of them. The week 1 game established their offense as a powerhouse and could be used, for example. But the game I remember the most is the Denver game, because even though Eli had done nearly the same thing the week before it really was his coming out party.
Thanks for the feedback.
July 13th, 2006 at 6:25 am
I’m not so sure about what you were saying about Dallas being inconsistent from week to week. Their results were somewhat inconsistant, but over all they won the games they were expected to win, and a few that they weren’t. Add to that the fact that when it came down to crunch time in the end of a close game they won most of them. I think the biggest problem they had was getting in the endzone consistantly, and their kicking for FGs was a little weak. That may have pushed them to try a few plays that they might not have if they had more confidence in their kicker. But overall they were a tough team to play against, especially at home. I’d say the reason they may have seemed very inconsistant was that they never put together any kind of streak (either victories or losses). But a large part of that was just the schedule playing an easy team one week, a tough one the next. Against weak Ds their offense did well, against teams that could shut down the run and force them to the air, it was another story. A similar situation with the D, some times they could stop the run and force opponents to the air, some weeks they couldn’t, and that mostly comes down to the D line, and the MLBs with a 3-4. Something that they had just moved to. In making the switch from a 4-3 to a 3-4 you can’t do it over night, or even in one season. It takes time to get the right people in place and get them used to their new coverages. Expect to see a different D this year, as they’ve had time to make the adjustments.