<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Giants&#8217; units ranked</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.nfl-giants.com/2006/giants-units-ranked/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.nfl-giants.com/2006/giants-units-ranked/</link>
	<description>New York Giants football blog: news &#38; analysis</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 01 May 2011 01:37:14 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael</title>
		<link>http://www.nfl-giants.com/2006/giants-units-ranked/comment-page-1/#comment-396</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Jun 2006 07:00:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://las-vegas-nv-online.com/nfl-giants/?p=565#comment-396</guid>
		<description>It may be that they&#039;re considering how balanced a teams offense is in those rankings.  I wouldn&#039;t expect a high ranking for Pitt&#039;s receivers, even though they&#039;re the Superbowl champs, they&#039;re a running team first and foremost.  If these are fantasy rankings they&#039;re probably being determined by past performance and likely performance this year.  With the Giants, yes Tiki&#039;s been stellar the last 2 years, but with Manning coming around and another year older, the addition of Moss, I can see how the Giants run game might go a little lower than expected in a fantasy forcast.  At the same time for receivers, you have Shockey, Burress, Toomer, Moss, and Tiki taking catches, and a mediocre finish at best from Manning last year (yes Manning should mature a lot but they might be doing a worse case expectations on the rankings) that&#039;s a lot of people to split the ball around to if you&#039;re looking to draft for your fantasy team.  I&#039;m not saying I agree with all the numbers, but I can understand why someone else might see it that way.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It may be that they&#8217;re considering how balanced a teams offense is in those rankings.  I wouldn&#8217;t expect a high ranking for Pitt&#8217;s receivers, even though they&#8217;re the Superbowl champs, they&#8217;re a running team first and foremost.  If these are fantasy rankings they&#8217;re probably being determined by past performance and likely performance this year.  With the Giants, yes Tiki&#8217;s been stellar the last 2 years, but with Manning coming around and another year older, the addition of Moss, I can see how the Giants run game might go a little lower than expected in a fantasy forcast.  At the same time for receivers, you have Shockey, Burress, Toomer, Moss, and Tiki taking catches, and a mediocre finish at best from Manning last year (yes Manning should mature a lot but they might be doing a worse case expectations on the rankings) that&#8217;s a lot of people to split the ball around to if you&#8217;re looking to draft for your fantasy team.  I&#8217;m not saying I agree with all the numbers, but I can understand why someone else might see it that way.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

